4Ps as Poverty Reduction Tool: A Macroeconomic Level Analysis

  • Richmond Keith Simeon Department of Economics, Pangasinan State University
Keywords: Rural Poverty, Human Capital Development, Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)

Abstract

Poverty is still the major development problem in the Philippines and has been largely a rural phenomenon. Development in the country, according to the 1996 Strategy to Fight Poverty in the Philippines by World Bank, requires greater opportunities provided by higher overall economic growth, combined with increased emphasis on human capital development. The aim of this study is to assess the development of the Philippines in accordance with the 1996 Strategy to Fight Poverty prescribed by the World Bank for the past decade (2006-2015). Using the techniques in quantitative economics i.e. Time Series Regression Analysis, the assessment was empirically tested by correlating the level of poverty in the Philippines with the aftermath of implementing Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) which has the purposes of directly targeting the rural poor. This study also employed descriptive statistics by using graphical analysis. The key findings of this study were the following: First, there is a significant decrease of poor population in the Philippines which was brought by economic growth and government policies during this time; second, the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program has succeeded in its aim of reducing rural poverty in the country.Rural poverty reduction in the Philippines therefore requires continuity of developing human capital through the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program. This study therefore provides an updated Strategy to Fight Poverty in the Philippines.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2009). Poverty in the Philippines: Causes, Constraints, and Opportunities. ISBN 978-971-561-857-1, pp. 1

Asian Development Bank. (2015). The Design, Expansion, and Impact of Pantawid”. Social Protection Support Project (Additional Financing): Report and Recommendation of the President.https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/phi-social-protection-support-project-af-rrp.

Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. Mcgrw-Hill Higher Education.

Official Gazzette of the Repubic of the Philippines. Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program.http://www.gov.ph/programs/conditional-cash-transfer

Orbeta, A. & Paqueo V. (2016). Pantawid Pamilya Pilipino Program: Boom or Bane? http://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/websitecms/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1656.pdf

Padilla, A. (2011). Policy Incoherence and the Philippine CCT Program” The Reality of Aid: An Independent Review of Poverty Reduction and Development Assistance.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2007). Notes on the Official Poverty Statistics in the Philippines, Series 2003-1

Reyes, C. & Tabuga, A. (2012). Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines: Is it Reaching the Extremely Poor? http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1242.pdf

Reyes, C. et al. (2012). Poverty and Agriculture in the Philippines: Trends in Income, Poverty and Distribution.http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1209.pdf

Reyes, C. et al. (2015). Promoting Inclusive Growth Through the 4Ps. http://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsrp1501.pdf

Son, H. (2010). Human Capital Development”. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 255. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28427/economics-wp225.pdf

Published
2021-08-14
How to Cite
Simeon, R. K. (2021). 4Ps as Poverty Reduction Tool: A Macroeconomic Level Analysis . ASEAN Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 8, 10-17. Retrieved from https://paressu.org/online/index.php/aseanmrj/article/view/274
Issue
Section
Articles